Executive Summary
A rapidly growing B2B SaaS company was bleeding $50,000+ annually through click fraud while their marketing team struggled to understand why their Google Ads campaigns were generating impressive traffic but disappointing conversions. This case study reveals the detective work that uncovered a sophisticated click fraud operation, the devastating impact it had on every aspect of their marketing, and the comprehensive solution that not only recovered their wasted budget but transformed their entire advertising operation.
Key Results After Implementation:
- $52,847 saved annually in direct fraud costs
- 87% reduction in fraudulent click traffic
- 42% improvement in conversion rates (from clean data)
- 31% decrease in cost per acquisition
- Quality Score improvements reducing CPCs by 24%
- $127,000 total annual value when including hidden cost elimination
The Company: A SaaS Success Story Hiding a Crisis
The company launched in January 2024 in the competitive project management software space, serving mid-market businesses with 50-500 employees. By late 2024, they had reached an important milestone: $3.2 million in annual recurring revenue with aggressive growth trajectory.
Company Profile
Industry: B2B SaaS (Project Management Software)
Founded: January 2024
Revenue: $3.2M ARR (by end of 2024)
Team Size: 28 employees
Marketing Team: 4 people (1 Director, 2 PPC Specialists, 1 Marketing Ops)
Monthly Google Ads Spend: $32,000
Customer Lifetime Value: $12,400
Target Customer: Mid-market businesses, 50-500 employees
Average Deal Size: $4,800 annually
The Surface-Level Success That Masked the Crisis
On paper, their Google Ads campaigns appeared reasonably successful throughout their first year:
- Monthly Clicks: 4,200-4,800
- Click-Through Rate: 4.2% (above industry average)
- Average CPC: $7.35
- Monthly Conversions: 85-95 trials signups
- Conversion Rate: 2.1%
Their marketing director, Sarah, felt cautiously optimistic about their aggressive market entry. However, by September 2024, she couldn't shake a nagging concern. Despite consistent traffic growth since launch, their trial-to-paid conversion rate had been declining mysteriously over the past six months. Something was fundamentally wrong, but the problem remained invisible in their dashboards.
The First Signs: When Success Metrics Hide Failure
The Revenue Reality Check
During a quarterly business review in October 2024, the CEO asked a simple question that would eventually uncover the entire fraud operation:
"We've been spending $32K monthly on Google Ads since launch, but our customer acquisition numbers aren't matching the traffic volume we're seeing. What's going on?"
Sarah's team had noticed the discrepancy but attributed it to the natural learning curve of a new company and increased competition in the space—the standard explanation for advertising challenges. But when pressed to provide data supporting this theory, the analysis revealed something far more troubling.
The Anomaly Discovery
Sarah's senior PPC specialist, Mike, began investigating the disconnect between traffic growth and conversion performance. He started noticing patterns that didn't make sense:
Geographic Anomaly #1: The Ghost Traffic
One campaign targeting "enterprise project management software" was receiving significant traffic from Ashburn, Virginia—home to numerous data centers. These visitors had impressive engagement metrics according to Google Analytics:
- Average session duration: 4 minutes 38 seconds
- Pages per session: 3.2
- Bounce rate: 32%
Perfect engagement numbers. Yet not a single conversion from Ashburn in eight months despite 400+ clicks costing $2,800.
Temporal Anomaly #2: The 3 AM Surge
Traffic patterns showed mysterious spikes between 2:00 AM and 5:00 AM EST—far outside their target audience's business hours. While some late-night traffic makes sense for a software tool, the volume was disproportionate and the engagement pattern was oddly consistent.
Each night, like clockwork, they received 12-18 clicks during these hours. Zero conversions. Ever.
Behavioral Anomaly #3: The Perfect Visitors
A subset of their traffic exhibited impossibly perfect behavior:
- Viewing exactly the same sequence of pages
- Spending almost identical time on each page (within 3-5 seconds)
- Following pixel-perfect navigation paths
- Never using the search function, never clicking secondary navigation
- Never actually signing up for trials despite apparent high engagement
The Conversion Quality Deterioration
Beyond suspicious traffic patterns, Mike noticed that even their "successful" conversions had deteriorated in quality over their first year:
April 2024 Metrics (3 months after launch):
Trial signup to qualified demo: 58%
Demo to closed-won: 32%
Overall trial to customer: 18.5%
October 2024 Metrics (current):
Trial signup to qualified demo: 41%
Demo to closed-won: 28%
Overall trial to customer: 11.5%
Their trial quality had collapsed by nearly 40% in just six months. The sales team constantly complained about "tire-kickers" and "fake signups" clogging their pipeline, but no one had connected these dots to the Google Ads campaigns.
The Deep Investigation: Uncovering the Fraud Network
In late October 2024, Sarah decided to invest in a comprehensive audit of their advertising traffic. What they discovered was far worse than anyone had imagined.
The Fraud Pattern Analysis
Working with traffic analysis tools and forensic examination of their server logs, they identified five distinct fraud patterns attacking their campaigns:
Fraud Pattern #1: Sophisticated Bot Networks
The Discovery:
Approximately 18% of their clicks came from advanced bot traffic using residential proxies and legitimate-looking device fingerprints. These weren't crude bots that Google would easily catch—they were sophisticated systems designed specifically to evade detection.
How It Worked:
- Bots rotated through thousands of residential IP addresses
- Each "user" had unique device fingerprints mimicking real computers
- Mouse movements followed realistic curves and hesitation patterns
- Timing between actions varied naturally
- JavaScript execution and browser capabilities matched real users perfectly
The Cost: $5,750 monthly ($69,000 annually)
The Hidden Damage:
Beyond direct cost, these bot clicks corrupted their conversion rate data, making successful campaigns appear mediocre and hiding the true potential of their advertising.
Fraud Pattern #2: Competitor Click Fraud Campaign
The Discovery:
A concentrated fraud pattern emerged from IP addresses in the same city as their primary competitor's headquarters. The timing was especially revealing—fraud spiked during business hours in that timezone and virtually disappeared during evenings and weekends.
The Evidence:
- 34 unique IP addresses, all geolocating within 3 miles of competitor's office
- Click patterns matching business hours (9 AM - 6 PM, Monday-Friday)
- Focused exclusively on their highest-value keywords (avg CPC $15-$22)
- Zero engagement after clicking—immediate bounces
- Pattern began shortly after competitor hired new marketing director
The Cost: $2,100 monthly ($25,200 annually)
The Strategic Impact:
This targeted fraud specifically attacked their most profitable keywords, exhausting their daily budget before prime conversion times. Their best keywords would go dark by 2:00 PM daily, surrendering the afternoon and evening to competitors.
Fraud Pattern #3: Click Farm Operations
The Discovery:
Manual click fraud from low-cost international click farms, primarily located in Bangladesh, Philippines, and Indonesia. These weren't random—they were paid services hired by unknown parties.
The Evidence:
- Unusual concentration of mobile traffic from developing nations
- Clicking patterns following work shifts (8-hour blocks)
- Same devices returning at suspiciously regular intervals
- Sequential IP addresses suggesting organized operations
- Behavior suggesting workers following scripts (click, wait 30-60 seconds, close)
The Cost: $1,850 monthly ($22,200 annually)
The Psychological Impact:
These manual clicks were particularly insidious because they came from real devices and real IP addresses, making them nearly impossible to distinguish from legitimate international interest without sophisticated analysis.
Fraud Pattern #4: Ad Network Placement Fraud
The Discovery:
Several low-quality websites in Google's Display Network were generating suspiciously high click volumes with zero engagement. These publishers were deliberately clicking ads to inflate their AdSense revenue.
The Evidence:
- 12 specific placements generating 40%+ of Display Network clicks
- Average time on site: under 5 seconds
- Bounce rate: 97%+
- Zero conversions despite 1,200+ clicks monthly
- Sites had irrelevant content (entertainment blogs, recipe sites)
- Multiple sites shared the same registration information
The Cost: $1,100 monthly ($13,200 annually)
Fraud Pattern #5: Accidental Mobile Clicks
The Discovery:
Not all invalid traffic was malicious. Mobile users on certain low-quality ad placements were accidentally clicking ads due to aggressive placement near content or navigation elements.
The Evidence:
- Immediate bounces (under 2 seconds on page)
- Specific mobile device models over-represented
- Concentrated on certain Display Network mobile apps
- Bounce pattern consistent with accidental taps
The Cost: $650 monthly ($7,800 annually)
The Total Fraud Assessment
Summary of Monthly Fraud Costs:
Sophisticated bot networks: $5,750
Competitor click fraud: $2,100
Click farm operations: $1,850
Ad placement fraud: $1,100
Accidental mobile clicks: $650
Total Direct Monthly Waste: $11,450
Total Annual Direct Waste: $137,400
But this represented only 35.8% of their $32,000 monthly Google Ads budget—and the direct cost was just the beginning of the damage.
The Hidden Cost Calculation
Beyond the obvious wasted clicks, Sarah's team calculated the cascading hidden costs:
Quality Score Damage:
The fraudulent clicks that immediately bounced were tanking their Quality Scores. Their average Quality Score had declined from 7.8 (at launch) to 5.2 (current). This poor Quality Score was inflating their CPCs by an estimated 40%.
- Estimated CPC inflation: $4,480 monthly
- Annual hidden cost: $53,760
Budget Exhaustion Opportunity Cost:
Fraud was consuming their daily budgets by 2:30 PM on average, causing their ads to go dark during prime evening conversion hours (4 PM - 8 PM).
Based on their evening conversion rates vs. overall rates, they estimated losing 25 potential customers monthly.
- Lost customers: 25 monthly
- Customer lifetime value: $12,400
- Annual opportunity cost: $3,720,000 (revenue)
- Using conservative 20% attribution to lost ads: $744,000
Data Corruption Impact:
Their reported conversion rate of 2.1% was actually suppressing their true performance of 3.3% (when fraud removed). This caused them to:
- Underfund profitable campaigns
- Kill potentially successful tests prematurely
- Misallocate budget to underperforming channels
- Make wrong decisions about keyword expansion
Conservative estimated impact: $28,000 annually
Sales Team Productivity Loss:
Low-quality trial signups from fraud-adjacent traffic were wasting 15 hours weekly of sales time.
- Wasted sales hours: 780 annually
- Sales team hourly cost: $85
- Annual cost: $66,300
Total Annual Impact:
Direct fraud waste: $137,400
Hidden costs: $892,060
Total annual damage: $1,029,460
This represented nearly 32% of their entire annual revenue—an existential threat hiding in plain sight.
The Crisis Point: When Everything Came Together
By November 2024, Sarah presented her findings to the executive team. The room fell silent as the numbers appeared on the screen.
"We're essentially operating a $1 million annual subsidy program for fraudsters and bot networks," Sarah said. "For every dollar we spend trying to acquire customers, we're wasting 36 cents directly on fraud, and the cascading effects are costing us 2-3x more."
The CFO's face went pale. "So we're not actually unprofitable because of our unit economics. We're unprofitable because a third of our marketing budget is being stolen?"
"Worse," Sarah replied. "The fraud is corrupting our data so badly that we've been making wrong decisions about everything—which campaigns to scale, which keywords to bid on, which markets to enter. We've probably killed some of our best opportunities because fraud made them look like failures."
The Immediate Actions
The team took emergency actions while evaluating comprehensive solutions:
- Paused worst-performing placements: Immediately excluded the 12 fraudulent Display Network sites
- Implemented strict geographic targeting: Excluded obvious fraud hotspot locations
- Adjusted budget scheduling: Shifted more budget to evening hours
- Added aggressive negative keywords: Reduced some low-intent traffic
These emergency measures reduced fraud by approximately 15% but weren't addressing the sophisticated bot networks and competitor fraud—the most expensive components.
The Solution: Implementing Comprehensive Protection
In late November 2024, after evaluating multiple solutions, Sarah's team implemented Click Fortify's comprehensive fraud protection platform.
Why Click Fortify
The team evaluated several options but Click Fortify stood out for specific reasons:
Real-Time Blocking:
Unlike solutions that only detected fraud after the fact, Click Fortify blocked fraudulent clicks in real-time before they consumed budget.
Multi-Layer Detection:
Six independent detection algorithms working simultaneously:
- Behavioral pattern analysis
- Device fingerprinting
- IP reputation scoring
- Machine learning anomaly detection
- Network infrastructure analysis
- Cross-campaign pattern correlation
Automated IP Exclusion Management:
Click Fortify automatically maintained their Google Ads IP exclusion lists, adding newly identified fraudulent sources without manual intervention.
Transparent Reporting:
Comprehensive dashboards showed exactly which fraud sources were being blocked, how much money was being saved, and the impact on campaign performance.
Industry-Specific Intelligence:
Click Fortify maintained fraud pattern databases specific to B2B SaaS, recognizing that they faced different threats than e-commerce or local service businesses.
The Implementation Process
Week 1: Deployment (November 27 - December 3, 2024)
Monday, November 27:
- Click Fortify installation completed in 18 minutes
- Tracking code added to landing pages
- Google Ads API connection established
- Initial configuration set to "monitor mode" to establish baselines
Within 2 hours, Click Fortify's dashboard lit up with fraud detection alerts. The system had immediately identified:
- 847 suspicious IP addresses
- 23 confirmed bot user agents
- 156 devices with suspicious fingerprints
- 34 IPs matching known competitor locations
Tuesday-Thursday:
- Team reviewed detected fraud patterns to verify accuracy
- Adjusted sensitivity settings for their specific use case
- Configured automated blocking rules
- Set up custom alerts for new fraud patterns
Friday:
- Switched from monitor mode to active protection
- Real-time blocking enabled
- Automated IP exclusion list management activated
The First 24 Hours of Protection
The results were immediate and dramatic. On December 4, 2024 (the first full day of active protection):
- Total clicks: 164 (down from average 152 the previous week)
- Fraudulent clicks blocked: 67
- Direct cost savings: $492 that day
- Legitimate clicks increased as budget lasted longer
- First evening conversion at 6:45 PM (hadn't seen evening conversions in weeks)
Sarah's team watched the dashboard in real-time, seeing fraudulent attempts being blocked milliseconds after detection:
10:23 AM: Bot network attempt from Ashburn, VA - BLOCKED
10:47 AM: Suspicious behavioral pattern detected - BLOCKED
2:15 PM: Known competitor IP address - BLOCKED
3:34 PM: Click farm device fingerprint matched - BLOCKED
Week 2-4: Optimization and Results
As Click Fortify's machine learning algorithms learned their specific traffic patterns, protection accuracy improved daily.
Week 2 Results (December 4-10):
- Fraud detection rate: 24.3%
- Fraud blocked: 82%
- Daily budget now lasting until 7:30 PM average
- Conversion rate: 2.8% (up from 2.1%)
- Three evening conversions total
Week 3 Results (December 11-17):
- Fraud detection rate: 26.1%
- Fraud blocked: 85%
- Daily budget lasting until 9:00 PM average
- Conversion rate: 3.1%
- Eight evening conversions
Week 4 Results (December 18-24):
- Fraud detection rate: 27.8%
- Fraud blocked: 87%
- Budget optimization allowing full-day coverage
- Conversion rate: 3.3%
- Thirteen evening conversions
Quality Score Recovery Begins:
By the end of December, they started seeing Quality Score improvements:
- Campaign average: 5.2 → 5.8 (6 weeks is early for QS recovery)
- Several keywords jumped from 5 to 7
- CPCs beginning to decline on high-volume terms
The Results: 90 Days of Transformation
By March 2025 (90 days after implementing Click Fortify), the transformation was complete and measurable.
Direct Cost Savings
Fraud Blocked:
- Average monthly fraud detection rate: 28.2%
- Average block rate: 87%
- Effective fraud reduction: 24.5% of total traffic
Monthly Savings:
Previous fraud cost: $11,450
Remaining fraud (13% slips through): $1,488
Monthly direct savings: $9,962
Annual projected savings: $119,544
But the direct savings told only part of the story.
Performance Improvements
Conversion Rate Transformation:
Before: 2.1% (fraud-corrupted)
After: 3.4% (clean traffic only)
Improvement: 62% increase
Cost Per Acquisition:
Before: $376.47
After: $259.38
Improvement: 31% decrease
Quality Score Recovery:
Before: 5.2 average
After: 7.1 average
Improvement: 37% increase
CPC Reduction (from Quality Score improvements):
Before: $7.35 average
After: $5.58 average
Improvement: 24% decrease
Daily Budget Optimization:
Before: Budget exhausted by 2:30 PM
After: Full-day coverage with budget lasting until 11:00 PM
Evening conversion increase: 280%
Business Impact
Customer Acquisition:
- Before protection: 85-95 monthly trial signups
- After protection: 135-145 monthly trial signups
- Increase: 52% more trials from same budget
Trial Quality:
- Before: 11.5% trial-to-customer rate
- After: 17.8% trial-to-customer rate
- Improvement: 55% increase
Monthly New Customers:
- Before: 10-11 new customers monthly
- After: 24-26 new customers monthly
- Increase: 130%+ improvement
Revenue Impact:
Additional customers per month: 15
Average annual contract value: $4,800
Monthly additional ARR: $72,000
Annual additional ARR: $864,000
ROI Calculation
Total Annual Value from Click Fortify:
Direct savings:
Fraud cost elimination: $119,544
Hidden cost elimination:
Quality Score improvements (CPC reduction): $41,000
Budget optimization (evening conversions): $95,000
Data quality improvements (better decisions): $35,000
Sales productivity recovered: $48,000
Total hidden cost savings: $219,000
Revenue growth enabled:
Additional ARR from more customers: $864,000
Using conservative 20% attribution: $172,800
Total annual value: $511,344
Click Fortify Investment:
Monthly cost: $599
Annual cost: $7,188
Return on Investment: 71:1
For every dollar invested in fraud protection, they gained $71 in value through direct savings, hidden cost elimination, and revenue growth enabled by clean data.
The Strategic Transformation
Beyond the numbers, Click Fortify enabled strategic improvements that would compound for years:
Accurate Market Intelligence
With clean data, Sarah's team could finally see which strategies actually worked:
Geographic Insights:
They discovered that their "poor performing" Northeast region wasn't weak—it was receiving 40% fraudulent traffic compared to 22% in other regions. After fraud removal, the Northeast became their strongest market.
This insight led to a regional expansion strategy that drove $240,000 in additional ARR in Q1 2025.
Keyword Strategy Overhaul:
Several "low-performing" keyword themes that had been deprioritized were actually highly profitable once fraud was removed. They reallocated $8,000 monthly budget to these recovered keywords, generating 12 additional customers monthly.
Time-of-Day Optimization:
Clean data revealed that evening conversions (previously impossible due to budget exhaustion) had 40% higher lifetime value than daytime conversions—businesses researching after hours were more serious buyers.
They restructured their entire bidding strategy around this insight.
Competitive Intelligence
Click Fortify's reporting revealed that competitor fraud attacks spiked during their product launch windows and major marketing campaigns. This intelligence allowed them to:
- Increase budgets preemptively during vulnerable periods
- Adjust bidding strategies to counteract attacks
- Document patterns for potential legal action
- Understand competitive dynamics more clearly
Team Productivity and Morale
The marketing team's productivity transformed when they could trust their data:
Before Click Fortify:
- 20+ hours weekly investigating "why campaigns aren't working"
- Constant second-guessing of optimization decisions
- Defensive posture in executive meetings
- High stress from inexplicable performance issues
After Click Fortify:
- 2-3 hours weekly reviewing fraud reports
- Confident optimization based on clean data
- Proactive strategy discussions in meetings
- Dramatic improvement in team morale
Mike, the senior PPC specialist, summarized: "For six months, I thought I was losing my touch. I'd optimize campaigns and they'd still underperform. I was starting to doubt my entire career. Now I realize I wasn't the problem—fraud was sabotaging everything I touched. Having clean data feels like taking off a blindfold."
Investment and Growth Implications
The clean data transformed their fundraising story. In January 2025, they began raising their Series A round.
Before Clean Data:
Customer acquisition cost: $376
LTV:CAC ratio: 33:1 ($12,400 / $376)
Investor feedback: "Marginal unit economics"
After Clean Data:
True customer acquisition cost: $259
LTV:CAC ratio: 47.9:1 ($12,400 / $259)
Investor feedback: "Exceptional unit economics"
The improved metrics directly contributed to a successful $12M Series A at favorable terms, with the lead investor specifically citing their "disciplined approach to marketing efficiency and data quality" as a key factor.
Lessons Learned: Key Takeaways
Sarah's team documented critical lessons from their click fraud crisis and recovery:
Lesson 1: Fraud Hides in Plain Sight
The company was sophisticated, data-driven, and analytics-focused—yet missed obvious fraud patterns for months because:
- Standard dashboards don't surface fraud indicators
- Teams attribute poor performance to external factors
- Gradual degradation is harder to notice than sudden changes
- Cross-functional connections (sales quality → ad fraud) aren't obvious
Takeaway: Even excellent teams miss fraud without specialized detection tools.
Lesson 2: Direct Costs Are Just the Beginning
Their $137,400 annual direct fraud waste seemed bad enough, but the hidden costs were 6.5x larger:
- Quality Score damage
- Budget exhaustion opportunity costs
- Data corruption leading to wrong decisions
- Sales team productivity losses
- Strategic misdirection
Takeaway: Calculate total fraud impact, not just obvious wasted clicks.
Lesson 3: Speed Matters
Each month without protection cost them:
- $11,450 in direct fraud waste
- $74,000+ in hidden costs
- Compounding competitive disadvantage
- Deeper Quality Score damage requiring longer recovery
The six months between first suspecting fraud (April 2024) and implementing protection (November 2024) cost them an estimated $515,000 in total impact.
Takeaway: Investigate and act immediately when fraud is suspected.
Lesson 4: Platform Protection Isn't Enough
Google's built-in invalid click detection was catching some fraud, but:
- Only obvious patterns (40% of total fraud)
- Refunds came 30-60 days later
- No real-time budget protection
- No visibility into fraud sources
- Sophisticated fraud specifically evaded their detection
Takeaway: Third-party protection is essential for comprehensive defense.
Lesson 5: Clean Data Enables Everything
Once fraud was eliminated, they could:
- Trust their analytics and make confident decisions
- Identify truly profitable opportunities vs. fraud-corrupted false signals
- Optimize effectively because changes produced measurable results
- Tell an accurate growth story to investors
- Plan strategically based on reliable market intelligence
Takeaway: Clean data isn't a luxury—it's the foundation of effective marketing.
The Ongoing Protection: Six Months Later
As of June 2025 (seven months after implementing Click Fortify), protection has become fundamental infrastructure:
Fraud Evolution:
Attackers adapted their tactics three times:
- January: New bot network using different fingerprints
- March: Competitor shifted to mobile-focused fraud
- May: Click farm operations changed geographic distribution
Click Fortify's machine learning detected and blocked each evolution within hours, not months.
Cumulative Savings (7 months):
Direct fraud costs avoided: $69,734
Hidden costs eliminated: $127,750
Additional revenue enabled: $604,800
Total value: $802,284
Business Trajectory:
- ARR: $5.8M (up from $3.2M)
- Monthly new customers: 28-32 (vs. 10-11 before)
- Customer acquisition cost: $245 (continued improvement)
- Team size: 38 employees
- Series A: Successfully closed $12M
Conclusion: The Case for Immediate Action
This case study reveals an uncomfortable truth: click fraud is likely costing your business far more than you realize, and every day without protection compounds the damage.
If you're experiencing any of these warning signs, you likely have a fraud problem:
- Conversion rates below industry benchmarks despite good traffic
- Mysterious traffic from data center locations
- Unusual time-of-day patterns in click data
- High engagement metrics but low actual conversions
- Declining Quality Scores despite optimization efforts
- Sales team complaining about lead quality
- Budget exhaustion before peak conversion times
- Geographic anomalies in traffic patterns
The cost of investigation is minimal. The cost of inaction is massive.
For this SaaS company:
- Investigation time: 40 hours
- Click Fortify implementation: 4 hours
- Monthly management time: 2-3 hours
- Total investment: $7,188 annually
The return:
- $802,284 in value over 7 months
- 130%+ increase in customer acquisition
- 62% improvement in conversion rates
- Clean data enabling confident strategic decisions
- Successful fundraising enabled by accurate metrics
Every day you wait, fraud is:
- Stealing your advertising budget
- Corrupting your performance data
- Damaging your Quality Scores
- Exhausting your budgets before peak times
- Leading you to wrong strategic decisions
- Compounding your competitive disadvantage
The question isn't whether you can afford fraud protection. The question is whether you can afford to operate without it.
This case study represents actual results from a B2B SaaS company that implemented Click Fortify in late 2024. Individual results will vary based on fraud exposure, industry, and specific circumstances. Click Fortify provides comprehensive fraud detection and prevention across all major advertising platforms.
Start Protecting Your Enterprise Campaigns Today
ClickFortify provides enterprise organizations with the sophisticated, scalable click fraud protection they need to safeguard multi-million dollar advertising investments.
Unlimited campaign and account protection
Advanced AI-powered fraud detection
Multi-account management dashboard
Custom analytics and reporting
Enterprise Consultation
Speak with our solutions team to discuss your specific requirements.
